Details

To the Regional HQ for the Council meeting. It is not streamed so you've gotta be there to see the whites of their eyes.

Mary-Frances Turner, President of York Region Rapid Transit Corporation, gets the ball rolling with a presentation on the Annual Report for 2014. Her delivery is relentlessly positive.

We learn that work on the Yonge Street Rapidway will start in June when construction crews will start digging up the road outside the Regional HQ. How deliciously appropriate.

John Taylor wants to know about compensation for businesses ground down by years of contruction work in Davis Drive. She tells him there will be a meeting with Metrolinx on Friday (24 April) to discuss business support and details will be posted on the website.

Now she is telling councillors about the series of “monumental announcements” made by the Province over recent days on transit infrastructure. We hear an update will go the next Committee of the Whole on Thursday 7 May.

Everyone seems happy enough with the way things are going with no discordant voices.

Tony Van Bynen says nothing (again)

Newmarket’s Mayor, Tony Van Bynen, is hunched over his desk, scribbling away. He rarely says much, if anything.

Van Bynen is also a Director of Newmarket Hydro and I learn that a report is coming to councillors on the development of a 20 year Electricity Plan for York Region. With Hydro One dominating the news this will be interesting stuff. On 28 April 2015, the “Integrated Regional Resource Plan” will be published showing how we can keep the lights on. This could become quite the political hot potato.

Now we are on to the controversial report from the Committee of the Whole meeting on 9 April 2015 which saw the recommendations from the Region’s Chief Planner,Val Shuttleworth, on the future of employment land in Markham rejected by councillors on a vote. Straight into the trash can they went.

Regional planners want a blank check

I am now listening to a lively discussion on “High Density Development within Identified Intensification Areas” where the Chief Planner seems to be asking for a blank check. She wants

“Regional staff (to) be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Region’s position, as required, for all development proposals that seek to reduce approved densities within intensification areas.”

Markham Regional Councillor, the splendidly inquisitive Jack Heath, says he is uncomfortable with this. It could be cutting regional councillors out of the discussion for things that will happen in the distant future.

An unusually assertive John Taylor joins in. He doesn’t want regional staff trooping off to the OMB to take a position “in opposition to a lower tier position”.  He suggests a compromise. Regional staff could appear at the OMB “when in alignment with the lower tier”. The language is clunky but we all know what he means. He doesn’t want Newmarket to be shafted by York Region at the OMB.

Shuttleworth explains that the Region wouldn’t want to see a reduction in density or “down zoning” in a centre or corridor earmarked for intensification.

Open disagreement (and more of this needed)

There is a real difference of opinion and it is unusual to see it burst out into the open in such a public way.

Jack Heath wants to know if the recommendation, as worded, simply reflects existing practice. If so, he would be reassured and be content with the wording.

Shuttleworth, squirming in her seat, is forced to concede that the wording “is a little bit different”.

Not all development proposals come to the Region. She explains there are other “approval authorities” (meaning the lower tier municipalities) where the Region’s role is to comment. The Region usually leaves delegated approvals alone but there may be instances where it would wish to take a position in support of the Regional Plan and its policies.

Left out of the loop

Taylor counters by insisting that councillors should not pre-approve a course of action, years in advance, giving Regional staff wide-ranging authority to challenge a local solution which, perhaps, may involve some reduction in density. He fears being left out of the loop.

Brenda Hogg, Taylor’s ally from Richmond Hill, wants to know about high density developments, outside the centres and corridors identified for intensification, which are equally a matter of concern. They draw activity away from the very areas earmarked for high growth.

Now things are getting complicated and Shuttleworth is losing her grip on things. It is time to smooth ruffled feathers. We hear that the planners are not going to go to the OMB “guns blazing on every issue”. She says she doesn’t want to open a Pandora’s Box. Hmmmm.

The Chair, Wayne Emmerson, says councillors will be told when the Region goes to the OMB. Shuttleworth adds: “If the Region is offside with our local municipal partners then you will know about it. It would be brought to (Regional) Council.”

And this is how it is left. Some councillors clearly believe that the planners, left to their own devices, would follow their own “city building” agenda even at the expense of the clearly expressed wishes of the lower tier municipalities such as Newmarket.

Markham Employment Lands

Now we return briefly to the thorny issue of the re-designation of employment land. Markham Regional Councillor, Joe Li, who previously had concerns about putting an hotel and theatre/convention centre on employment lands, wants to change the position he took a fortnight ago. He has met the developer and it is now OK.

Taylor asks Shuttleworth if she has any comments. No.

Now the Mayor of Vaughan, Maurizio Bevilacqua, moves an amendment expanding the study area of a proposed mobility hub at the Concord GO Centre. The Secondary Plan envisages a new GO Rail Station. (So does Newmarket’s Secondary Plan though the one at Mulock Drive is a figment of Rick Nethery's imagination.)

Taylor, who admits he knows nothing about the amendment, again presses Shuttleworth for her views. She is well briefed, telling him it expands the study area to both sides of the railway track and envisages a mix of uses, not just employment.  He is right to press the planners for answers and to do so without equivocation.

Di Biase has nothing to say

Throughout all these exchanges, Newmarket’s Mayor looks on in a disinterested kind of way while the chair of Planning and Development, the disgraced Michael Di Biase, censured a few days ago by his own City of Vaughan for improperly interfering in the tendering process, stays resolutely silent. Not a word passes his lips throughout the entire meeting. He will be picking up his York Region pay cheque nonetheless.

I look at his face for signs of penitence or contrition but I see nothing.

Meanwhile Wayne Emmerson chairs the meeting with his usual jolly banter.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Details

Vaughan city council has voted unanimously to dock three month’s pay from Regional Councillor Michael Di Biase for breaching the City’s code of conduct by interfering in the tendering process and harassing and intimidating staff.

This means he will forfeit about $21,000 of the $84,301 he gets as Deputy Mayor of Vaughan. The Toronto Star reminds its readers that Di Biase also gets $52,000 from York Region where he chairs the sensitive Planning and Economic Development Committee, a berth which many people will now consider wholly inappropriate.

The Star says it is unclear if his pay suspension will include his pay from the region.

It should. No doubt about it.

Di Biase cannot simply shrug his shoulders and behave as if nothing has happened, business as usual.

The report from Integrity Commissioner, Suzanne Craig, makes jaw-dropping reading.

The man whose complaint triggered the investigation, Richard Lorello, alleged, amongst other things, that construction work done on Di Biase’s cottage, 90 kilometres to the north of the city, had been paid for by a company whose interests in Vaughan Di Biase was promoting.

The Integrity Commissioner didn’t investigate these allegations “which on their face are allegations of a criminal nature” advising Lorello to take the matter up with the police. The Star says he is doing just that.

Craig interviewed 32 council employees. On pages 19 and 20 of her report she quotes the tongue lashing staff received when they told Di Biase there were procedures that had to be followed when the city was awarding contracts.

Di Biase told one hapless employee to

“stop wasting time and don’t be a troublemaker and cause problems”.

To another Di Biase ordered:

“Just deal with it and make it happen”.

When Di Biase’s favoured company didn’t qualify for tendering:

“You have to be ****ing kidding me. They have to pre-qualify.”

Di Biase tells a city staffer:  

“Don’t make waves.”

And one pearl of a quote from Vaughan’s Deputy Mayor:

“Tell your boss, when I call, respond to your ****ing phone.”

Tomorrow, Thursday 23 April, York Regional Council meets at 9.30am.

This is an ideal opportunity for Regional Councillor Michael Di Biase to do the right thing.

He should request five minutes to make a personal statement, acknowledging the fact that councillors in his own municipality accept the Integrity Commissioner’s findings – even if he still protests his innocence.

He should volunteer to give up three months pay from York Region ($13,000) and stand down as Chair of Planning and Economic Development on the grounds that his integrity and impartiality have been totally compromised.

I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.

You can read the final report of the Integrity Commissioner, dated 17 April 2015, here.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Details

Last week (17 April), Ontario Premier, Kathleen Wynne, gave details of the improved service we can expect to see on the Barrie line.

We are promised an all-day two-way service every 15 minutes from Union Station to Aurora and a “new two-way hourly service to Barrie during the midday, evenings and weekends”.

This is impressive – but, of course, it is not what was promised at the outset.

Newmarket – a designated growth centre slated for a 33,000 plus population increase in the Yonge/Davis corridors - now, unbelievably, lies outside the “core area” which qualifies for the 15 minute service.

I've long worried that the original commitment was morphing into something else.

Still, for all that, I see a glass half full, not half empty. It is terrific news for the Town and will bring huge positive benefits, providing, always, that it is delivered.

Local MPP, Chris Ballard, tweeted

@lynngr Enhanced service coming to Newmarket. Need time to build a number of crossings in Newmarket before 15 min. service possible, though.

2.41PM – 17 Apr 2015

Grade separations at Davis Drive and Green Lane would have cost an arm and a leg – and may be pushed back indefinitely - so who knows when we are going to get a 15 minute service? How much time does Chris Ballard need?

In the meantime, the level crossing, with its bells and flashing red lights, will remain in the heart of the growth corridor at Davis Drive, quaintly stopping traffic, including the buses on the new rapidway, every time a train rumbles by.

Last week we were told that the current 70 weekly trips on the Barrie line will grow to more than 200 over the next five years. This enhanced service from Newmarket north to Barrie requires a second track and we wait to see how this will be fitted into the programme. Land will have to be acquired for the wider rail corridor and, perhaps, there will be changes to the current alignment, straightening out the track where it snakes.

Newmarket’s Committee of the Whole has been promised a report by the end of June “reviewing the implications of all-day GO Transit service from a municipal perspective" which will address parking issues and the like. Another report – outstanding since 29 September 2014 but again expected by June – asks staff “to review GO Train operations including east-west road connections, grade separations, speed within the downtown core…” Maybe these reports will start to fill in some of the blanks.

With gridlock looming, all political parties have an obligation to spell out how they would pay for the transit improvements that are so desperately needed. Personally, I would keep Hydro One in the public sector and find the cash from elsewhere. I'd look at fuel duties, congestion charges, road tolls and more besides. 

But we are where we are. And the Liberal Government is at last doing what needs to be done.

The Province can tax more, borrow more or sell or lease its assets. But it can’t print money. Another quest for “greater efficiencies” within Government will not come up with the barrow loads of cash that is required.

If politicians spend their time loudly criticising what is on the table, fearful of offering their own alternative, I tune them out.

Best way.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Details
The Toronto Star has today published this correction to a news story it ran on 11 April 2015.
  • "An April 11 article about what municipal leaders were paid in 2014 misstated the salary of Newmarket mayor Tony Van Bynen. Van Bynen’s salary was not $182, 000.

"In fact, Van Bynen’s total compensation was $159.856.84 in 2014. That included $91,164.26 in salary for his role as mayor (which includes a tax-free portion of $30,379) and $53,165.58 salary for serving as a representative of York council. His compensation also included taxable benefits of $6,762 from the town and $8,794 in benefits from the region.

"The article also mistakenly said that Winnipeg mayor Brian Bowman was paid $178,114 in 2014. In fact, Bowman only became mayor in November of 2014."

Tony Van Bynen is also a director of Newmarket Hydro by virtue of his office as Mayor. We must assume this is not remunerated.

Details

I was surprised to read in Saturday’s Toronto Star (11 April) that Newmarket’s Mayor, Tony Van Bynen, appears 4th in a list of “what Mayors in some Canadian cities earned in 2014”.

It gives the impression that our Mayor is among the top paid in Canada in 2014. He says the figures are all wrong.

Responding to a tweet from journalist Deborah Kelly, the Mayor wrote:

@deborahkelly  Debra, FYI Star article is incorrect. It should read $151K not $182K. Will ask Star to Correct. Includes both Town and Region.

8:43 AM – 11 April 2015

And earlier this afternoon, the man who challenged Van Bynen last year for the Mayoralty, Chris Campbell, tweeted:

@TonyVanBynen easily highest paid based on population/job creation. Not better on most issues. 26% wage increase? Twitter.com/deborahkelly/s…

2015-04-14, 2.25 PM from Newmarket, Ontario

Two questions arise from all this. Are the figures correct? And, put crudely, is Van Bynen worth it?

But first let's be clear, there is a confusing mass of figures out there. And if expenses/benefits are factored in, this inflates the numbers further. The malicious will lump everything in together, taxable and non taxable. We should be talking solely about taxable income.

With these caveats the Mayor’s salary is either

 (a) $113,921 plus taxable benefits of $6,762. (from the Sunshine list)

or

(b) $91,313 plus benefits of $16,383 of which $8,794 is recovered from the region (from the Town of Newmarket’s Statement of Remuneration and Expenses for 2014).

I exclude the auto allowance ($6,463) and other expenses ($5,381) that are necessary for the Mayor to do the job. 

The Mayor also serves on York Region. For this, he gets $52,987. This should be added to the sums in either (a) or (b) above. Benefits paid by the Region totalling $8,794 are reimbursed to the Town. The benefits include the Region’s share of contributions to OMERS, Canada Pension Plan and premium costs for life insurance.

I get to the Mayor’s figure of $151,000 by adding together $91,313 plus the taxable benefits of $6,762 plus York salary of $52,978. But this is me making assumptions and jotting stuff down on the back of an envelope.

Comparing apples with apples

Some Mayors serving on York Region are on the Sunshine List, others are not. Their municipalities are obliged by s284(1) of the Municipal Act to publish annually, on or before 31 March, Statements of Remuneration and Expenses. There are variations in the way these are reported and it is not a simple task comparing apples with apples and sifting out taxable from non-taxable income.

Mayor Frank Scarpitti of Markham has, of course, made the headlines and so too has Mayor Steve Pellegrini of King but for different reasons. East Gwillimbury’s Mayor, Virginia Hackson, is on the Sunshine List  ($119,772 plus taxable benefits of $9,209) but Aurora’s Geoffrey Dawe is not there. His remuneration is $89,663 according to his municipality’s reporting. But if his York "supplement" of $55,162 were added he would qualify for the Sunshine List.

Matching figures on the Sunshine List with the same individuals who feature in the remuneration and expenses reports of municipalities is not a straightforward exercise. The sums can vary, no doubt for very good reasons. The Sunshine List has the Mayor of Vaughan, Maurizio Bevilacqua, on $173,459 plus taxable benefits of $7,883 and the Mayor of Richmond Hill, David Barrow, on $173,379 plus taxable benefits of $3,598.

Is he worth it?

So, whatever he gets, is Tony Van Bynen worth it?

Those who are hugely antagonistic towards him wouldn’t pay him the minimum wage. Others value him highly. He keeps the show on the road in a low key, avuncular kind of way. Personally, I think he is very skilled at chairing meetings though he is rather too house-trained for my liking. His long years as a banker have programmed him to swallow uncritically the professional opinions of staff even when they are crying out to be challenged.

The Town’s Chief Administrative Officer, Bob Shelton, gets a useful $239,230. He gives a good impression of having a handle on things and I’ve never seen him (yet) lost for words at a Council meeting. His comparators would be Chief Executives in the same family or type of municipalities as Newmarket. In the same way, the Mayor’s salary should be compared with those in similar municipalities with similar levels of responsibility.

Big Salaries; Fair Taxation

It is impossible to talk about about big salaries without talking about fair taxation. They are two sides of the same coin. Four Federal tax bands for 2015 are simply not enough to capture the huge spread of taxable income, from modest to stellar. (The average Canadian income is $47,358)

The top rate of Federal tax is 29% of taxable income over $138,586. So our Mayor falls into the same tax band as, say, the Onex CEO, Gerry Schwartz, whose eye-watering total pay package is $87.9 million.

Absurd and indefensible?

You bet.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

You can check the Toronto Star's corrections by date here.

 

  • You are here:  
  • Home