- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
The spat between Newmarket-Aurora’s Progressive Conservative MPP, Dawn Gallagher Murphy, and her former Constituency Office Manager, Teena Bogner, is gripping stuff.
Earlier this month I took myself down to the Ontario Labour Relations Board in Toronto’s University Avenue and asked to see the file. I was shown Bogner’s complaint and Gallagher Murphy’s response but the supporting documentation was withheld for legal reasons. But all will be revealed at the Hearing which is expected in February 2025. (Photo: Bogner right)
Their separate accounts of what happened between 9 April 2024 and 10 June 2024 – when Bogner was sacked - could not be more different. Gallagher Murphy accuses Bogner of creating an “untenable work environment”.
Imperious
For her part, Bogner brands Gallagher Murphy, an imperious bully:
“The Member’s erratic and hostile behaviour continued, including unnecessary interruptions during the Applicant’s (Bogner’s) personal time, derogatory comments about colleagues, hanging up on the Applicant, and an overall toxic work environment that affected the Applicant’s health.”
Gallagher Murphy insists it was Bogner who pestered her for the job and it was she (Bogner) who was the disrupter in the office. She was the one who allegedly harassed other staff!
It seems to be a classic case of “she said, she said”.
Deceit
So (not to put too fine a point on it) who is being deceitful?
Being the kind of person Bogner is - a stickler for process and follower of rules and protocols - she may well have rubbed people up the wrong way as she tried to create order out of chaos in Gallagher Murphy’s office. I can well believe there was a titanic clash of personalities.
In her Linked-In profile, Bogner describes herself this way:
"I am an inspiring, motivated, and collaborative leader committed to achieving, and exceeding, strategic goals. I lead diverse teams in a fast paced and demanding environment to facilitate and deliver leading edge governance policies and procedures, change management, and elections. I have significant government relations practice, from my work within the legislative assembly and non-for-profits."
Taxpayers' Advocacy
Years ago, when Bogner was President of the Newmarket Taxpayers’ Advocacy Group (NTAG) - and without asking her first - I put her on my mailing list as I was regularly blogging on Town issues and I wanted her to be aware of my thinking.
When she got the (temporary) job of returning officer for Newmarket-Aurora in the 2019 Federal Election – an important role carrying with it a great deal of responsibility - she bluntly told me to take her name off my mailing list as she had to be scrupulously impartial. No problem. I did so immediately. So would a person like this invent these interactions with Gallagher Murphy?
Economical with the actualité
On balance I prefer to believe Bogner’s version of events.
Harassment
Gallagher Murphy says
“At no time did Bogner make any complaint of harassment in convention (sic) of the Caucus Harassment Policy or take any acts as contemplated by the OHSA.”
That sounds pretty definitive. But some of the material Bogner relies on may be in the video or phone recordings or in the other supporting documentation which, as I say, we cannot yet see.
The stakes are high for Bogner and Gallagher Murphy.
They can’t both be telling the truth.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
To read Bogner's complaint and Gallagher Murphy's response click "read more" below.
Read more: Bogner vs Gallagher Murphy: Who is telling the truth?
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
Newmarket-Aurora’s Liberal MP, Tony Van Bynen, has called on Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to step down as Prime Minister immediately. 
The revelation in this morning’s Toronto Star was, for me, truly astonishing. This bold action is totally out of character for Newmarket's former Mayor who never makes any consequential decision without (in his own words) “scoping” things out first.
I have been observing Van Bynen for years and I’ve found him to be timidly middle-of-the-road on virtually every issue, contentedly reading scripts written by others. I recall the late (and much missed) Dave Kerwin telling Van Bynen to his face that he was not a leader. So true.
Leading from the front?
Van Bynen rarely tries to move and shape public opinion on controversial issues. In that respect his statement on Gaza was unusual and since then he has said little on the subject, retreating like a hermit crab back into the safety of his shell.
In 2016 Van Bynen came up with this little gem:
“Leadership is as much about followership.”
In a blog from five years ago I wrote:
“Tony Van Bynen has many qualities but leading from the front is not one of them. He is essentially an administrator, cautious and secretive as befits an old banker.”
The Van Bynen I know doesn’t put his head above the parapet unless others have done so before him and have signalled the coast is clear.
So Van Bynen’s declaration tells me Trudeau’s days are truly numbered. Survival is now impossible. (Photo right: Trudeau campaigning for Van Bynen in Newmarket's Main Street in October 2019)
Motivation
Of course, we don’t yet know Van Bynen’s motivation for speaking out. He joined the Liberal Party in his late sixties solely to become a Liberal MP. No other candidates threw their hats into the ring and he was acclaimed. Earlier this year he announced his retirement and is, I suppose, trying to maximise the chances of his successor, Jennifer McLaghlan.
He may have something further to say on Trudeau's predicament.
But, then again, maybe not.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
From this morning's Toronto Star:
The Star's survey of Liberal MPs: 18 say Trudeau should stay. 22 said he should go. 10 sat on the fence and 102 made no comment.
Update on Sunday 22 December 2024: This is from Van Bynen’s ad in Sunday’s Newmarket Today – the day after the Star reported he called on Trudeau to step down as Prime Minister immediately:
“Tony ran to be your Member of Parliament because he understands that we need to protect a healthy environment, invest in healthcare, and offer real help to families in our community. He is committed to working with Justin Trudeau to continue to grow our middle class, and he will never stop working for the people of Newmarket—Aurora.”
Time for an update.
Update on 24 December 2024: From Newmarket Today: Newmarket-Aurora MP calls on the Prime Minister to Resign. Van Bynen is quoted as saying:
"I believe the prime minister has had ample opportunity to demonstrate a renewed leadership and to address the concerns of many members of his caucus. Unfortunately, I do not feel that he has delivered on the discussions we had through the summer and the fall and so the time has arrived for him to resign - to provide opportunity for new leadership and allow a renewal of our party to take place."
Update on 30 December 2024: From the Globe and Mail: Atlantic Liberal caucus asks Trudeau to resign and allow party to replace him - https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-atlantic-liberal-caucus-asks-trudeau-to-resign-and-allow-party-to/?utm_source=Shared+Article+Sent+to+User&utm_medium=E-mail:
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
An explosive story in this morning’s Newmarket Era paints Newmarket-Aurora’s Progressive Conservative MPP, Dawn Gallagher Murphy, as a strutting tyrant presiding over a toxic work environment. 
The exposé, written by the respected senior journalist Lisa Queen, gives details of a complaint against the MPP filed with the Ontario Labour Relations Board by her one-time Office Manager Teena Bogner, a former President of the Newmarket Taxpayers Advocacy Group (NTAG).
Sacked
Bogner started working for the MPP on 9 April 2024 and learned on 10 June 2024 that she was to be sacked.
Bogner says Gallagher Murphy’s behaviour was “erratic and hostile” with the MPP routinely making derogatory comments about people. She said the work environment was so toxic it affected her health.
The details are here.
As it happens, I’ve been getting emails since early August 2024 from an employee at Ontario’s Legislative Assembly passing on detailed information about Gallagher Murphy and what she gets up to. On 4 August 2024 I was told she “bullies and harasses” her staff. And that she is:
“loathed in the PC caucus.”
and
“She has nothing good to say about anyone. What she calls the MPs and mayors is not worthy of repeating. She is a horrible person.”
Behind the Mask
This is pretty strong stuff (and there’s lots more of it in a similar vein). I’m not posting information that alleges improper behaviour and names individuals.
There are laws on defamation.
But the facts as reported in the Newmarket Era chime with what I’ve been told quite separately.
I think that says something about the kind of person Dawn Gallagher Murphy really is, behind the mask.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Update on 19 December 2024: From Newmarket Today: Fired employee accuses Newmarket-Aurora MPP of toxic behaviour. The hearing is scheduled for February 2025.
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
This morning an email comes winging in from Newmarket-Aurora’s timid Liberal MP, Tony Van Bynen, reminding us of the government’s tax break 
“making essentially all food and many holiday essentials tax-free for two months.”
Van Bynen lists the tax exempt items which include beer, wine and cider, chips, candy, granola bars, Christmas trees and decorations. Van Bynen says this will
“put between $100 and $300 more in workers’ pockets on a basket of $2,000 in purchases over the next two months.”
Tony Van Bynen is, of course, programmed to parrot the Party line. Always has been.
Costly Political Gimmicks
So I wonder what he makes of the Deputy Prime Minister’s resignation letter which I thought was pretty brutal, directly criticizing Trudeau.
Chrystia Freeland says the challenges of a second Trump term and the threat of 25% tariffs mean:
“eschewing costly political gimmicks.”
So is the tax-free holiday a gimmick?
No point asking Tony Van Bynen who would never say anything that could generate acrimonious criticism. On 26 January 2021 he told the House of Commons
“I have been a banker for almost 30 years and have seen our economy endure things like sovereign debt crisis, the tech bubble, the real estate bubble and interest rates at 18%. One thing I have learned throughout all of these crises is it is important for us to work together toward a common goal and avoid acrimonious criticism, which is counterproductive for everyone.”
Doomed
The Federal Liberals are doomed. The wheels are coming off the wagon.
The Liberal caucus increasingly indulges in acrimonious criticism - and to hell with the consequences. They just want Justin gone.
It has been as plain as a pikestaff for months that the Liberals would be better off changing their leader. But, for the moment, he is staying put. Trudeau has faced his critics down before.
But this time is different.
Sell-by date
All politicians have a shelf life. And the longer they stay, the more people will become disaffected for policy and for other reasons. This is just the nature of the beast in open democracies.
Trudeau promised electoral reform in 2015 but that was quickly jettisoned. He should have banned handguns after the massacre at Portapique. But he didn't. Instead, a long drawn out inquiry which reported years after the anger had subsided. And no ban.
I have a growing list of things that Trudeau should have done but didn't as he endlessly triangulates in the best Bill Clinton fashion.
Morneau's assessment
But reading Bill Morneau's book about his time as Trudeau's Finance Minister was a revelation.
The meeting Morneau had with Trudeau - when he was leaving the Government - was the longest he had ever had, one to one, with the Prime Minister.
Trudeau is just not that interested in policy making.
It's the performative aspects of the job of Prime Minister that appeals.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
- Details
- Written by Gordon Prentice
Dawn Gallagher Murphy’s third “free” BBQ on 29 September 2024 at Newmarket's Riverwalk Commons has cost the taxpayers a modest $881 - so far. 
We shall have to wait until 1 March 2025 to find the true cost.
Personally, I find these so-called “free” BBQs a scandalous waste of public money. They are designed with one aim in mind: to butter up the voters.
These extravagant events - billed to the taxpayers - are becoming normalised. And that's a problem.
Giving money away
In the old days Doug Ford used to hand people $20 bills from his own wallet. Now he prefers the public purse.
Gallagher Murphy’s first annual “free” BBQ on 16 October 2022 cost taxpayers a whopping $11,160 - almost one quarter of her annual budget for “office operations”.
The second free BBQ on 22 October 2023, where people were noticeably thin on the ground, cost us $9,376.
The MPP’s travel and hospitality expense claims for the period 1 July 2024 – 30 September 2024 were published by the Ontario Legislature earlier today (2 December 2024). Her other expenses are reported separately.
The balance of her BBQ costs will be claimed in the reporting period 1 October 2024 – 31 December 2024 with the details published by 1 March 2025.
The Legislative Assembly website explains why some expenses are posted months after the transaction date.
"Expenses are reported after they are approved and processed in the financial system. An individual may incur an expense on a specific date, but the expense might not be submitted or approved until a later date."
After the dust has settled.
This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Page 1 of 274